The importance of field testing your gear

Tacticool

You might have a sweet looking tactical kit sitting in your closet, maybe you’ve even worn it out on the flat range a few times. Yet how practical is it and have you truly field tested your equipment? If you really put your equipment through the paces flaws could become exposed which might change your opinion about fit, finish or reliability. It might not even have to do with the quality or price of the product, it could be due to your body composition or personal preferences. If the kit/equipment you own was inspired by your YouTube heroes and some anonymous posters on your favorite Internet Forum, it might do you some good to get out there and do a little personal field testing. In order to back up my claim of how important this is, I’ll go ahead and share some personal experiences that I have had (read: mistakes I have made) related to specific pieces of equipment I have owned.

Boots: I have plenty of boots, easily 20 pair and some that I have never even worn. One of the biggest mistakes I made was to purchase a pair of cool guy aftermarket boots just because a few friends seemed to like them, but none of them had ever worn them under strenuous conditions. I paid $150 for these specific boots and after the initial excitement wore off the reality set in that these were not for me. Out in adverse conditions flaws in the boot design became immediate and they were quickly relegated to the bottom shelf in storage. I should have stuck with what had always worked for me in the past.

Assault Vest: Sometimes tried and true designs are best and I learned my lesson the hard way. I paid quite a bit of money for an expensive assault vest as I was stuck on the brand name and the very cool design. I paid so much for it that even after I knew that it was terrible I continued to try to make it work. I hated the thing but it was so impractical/bulky and the exact opposite of what I wanted it to be. I ended up going back to a previous design that very much resembled the MOLLE kit issued by our Armed Forces. I have no idea where that vest is now, probably in the bottom of my basement somewhere.

Plate Carrier: You get what you pay for, or do you? Sometimes you get disappointed by what you pay for because you ended up paying too much for something that you will never use. I’m going to dedicate an entire post to a plate carrier review (using two brands) here soon, but the point here is when I field tested my expensive carrier it immediately became apparent that this was not what I needed. It was indeed well constructed and good for flat range duty but for my purposes it just didn’t work. I ended up going with a carrier that was about 1/3 of the cost of the original one and tossing my expensive one into a storage bin.

Gloves: I’ve gone through quite a few gloves lately and have yet to find some that perform as well as simple Mechanix gloves or military issued flyers (Aviator) gloves. Sure I have some cool Oakley gloves, Wiley X gloves and even some A-stars but after considerable time on the range I found that the simple gloves were the best for me. Too bad it took me lusting over cool looking gloves online (and subsequently purchasing them) in order to find out that they weren’t up to the task.

Here’s the bottom line: Test what you might depend on to protect your life (or even give you a few more points during a competition). Does your kit / equipment fit? How does it hold up when you are running and bouncing around, can you operate all of your systems and is everything positioned in the right place for you to do so comfortably? Just because one guy in a video, on a forum, or even on a blog says that brand X is great doesn’t mean that brand X is right for you. Don’t make the mistake of solely relying on someone else’s opinion or simply not taking the time to field test your own gear.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 comments

1 pings

Skip to comment form

    • Dustin on March 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM
    • Reply

    I had a tactical 72-hour pack that was great for storing everything I needed for a 3-day camping trip. I carried the pack several times for a few miles and it was heavy, but extremely durable. No worries…

    Now that I’m conditioning for a long weekend hiking on the AT, I found some serious issues with that pack, the amount of weight (~ 30#) and the lack of suspension the pack had. After an 11-mile hike, my back was telling me that it was not even close to interested in doing this several days in a row.

    I sold the pack to a friend who needed a tough BOB and got a dedicated backpacking/trekking bag with full suspension system.

    Bottom line, had I discovered this issue on the trail, with several days of long distance hiking to go, I would have been a hurting unit.

    Go out, put your gear through its paces – it you’re afraid of damage or usage of the gear, then you’ll likely not be able to find out any shortcomings until its WAY too late.

    Be Well.

    -Dustin

      • PJ on March 4, 2013 at 5:37 PM
        Author
      • Reply

      Dustin,

      Great comment, thanks for sharing. Out on the trail is where you will find out how the gear holds up. Glad you were able to diagnose your issue and find something more suitable to your needs.

      PJ

    • jo on March 10, 2013 at 12:54 PM
    • Reply

    what pack did you go to instead?

    • Ranger W on March 11, 2013 at 3:09 AM
    • Reply

    I still prefer a military ALICE pack. But I must admit I have never tried any of the top of the line civilian style trek bags. I guess for me its just a “aint broke, dont fix” kind of thing.

      • PJ on March 11, 2013 at 5:28 PM
        Author
      • Reply

      The only thing I needed to upgrade on my ALICE pack was the shoulder straps, which I got from Tactical Tailor. Other than that it’s perfect.

  1. […] best thing going, but 3 miles into a hike your feet might be screaming bloody murder.  You have to field test your equipment to see if it will hold up under pressure, so that said I decided to do one of my living room […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.